🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord created to safeguard females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to establish laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that rights groups described as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries